<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peak Oil Matters &#187; U.S. production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peakoilmatters.com/tag/u-s-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peakoilmatters.com</link>
	<description>A fresh perspective on the concept of peak oil and the challenges we face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Still More Never-Ending Efforts To Skate Past The Facts Of Peak Oil (Pt 2)</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/03/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-2/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/03/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=1040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[NOTE: Back in April, I followed-up on a series of posts which I first began nearly a year ago and last discussed back in April ([links below*). In that series, I’ve discussed the apparently limitless ability of too many to either ignore facts about oil production entirely, or who instead resort to efforts where disingenuous [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/03/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even More Never-Ending Efforts To Skate Past The Facts Of Peak Oil</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/04/27/even-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/04/27/even-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANWR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athabasca Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In two posts (here and here) written several months ago, I discussed once again the unfortunate truth that there remains a determined effort by some to either completely discount the reality of declining oil production, or who skate along the edges of truth by resorting to combinations of disingenuous arguments or incomplete facts.
Three articles in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/04/27/even-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STILL Not Getting It (Pt 2)</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/03/28/still-not-getting-it-pt-2/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/03/28/still-not-getting-it-pt-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New Direction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shale gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[NOTE: This is the latest installment in a new PeakOilMatters series (which started here). It’s about finding a new and better vision to get to, through, and beyond Peak Oil and its widespread impact on what we produce, how we produce, and how we live. We won’t be falling off a cliff tomorrow, and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/03/28/still-not-getting-it-pt-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clueless Is Not A Strategy (Cont&#8217;d/Final)</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/03/03/clueless-is-not-a-strategy-contdfinal/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/03/03/clueless-is-not-a-strategy-contdfinal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A New Direction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[NOTE: This is the fourth and final in a subset of posts (see the first one here) in a new PeakOilMatters series (which began here). It’s about finding a new and better vision to get to, through, and beyond Peak Oil and its widespread impact on what we produce, how we produce, and how we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/03/03/clueless-is-not-a-strategy-contdfinal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still Dealing With Peak Oil-Denying Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/11/22/still-dealing-with-peak-oil-denying-nonsense/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/11/22/still-dealing-with-peak-oil-denying-nonsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANWR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Global Climate Change, Human Security &#38; Democracy Project from the University of California (Santa Barbara) has issued a report (PDF here) discussing the problems awaiting us at the convergence of peak oil, energy decline, and global warming.
The report offered a concise summary of the current state of our oil supply considerations:
* Peak oil is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/11/22/still-dealing-with-peak-oil-denying-nonsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Considerations About American Oil Consumption</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/23/more-considerations-about-american-oil-consumption/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/23/more-considerations-about-american-oil-consumption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post, I’m going to continue with the theme of my most recent entry and provide you with some additional considerations about oil consumption here in the United States. While few of the facts to be cited will surprise anyone very much, I doubt many are considered very often, if at all.  I believe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/23/more-considerations-about-american-oil-consumption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil Consumption In The United States</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/19/oil-consumption-in-the-united-states/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/19/oil-consumption-in-the-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cantarell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order for us to begin thinking differently about Peak Oil and its implications, and to begin envisioning what kinds of changes we can make (and will likely have no choice about), we should first understand our oil situation and consumption. This post is an introduction.
If the Peak Oil proponents are correct, we are in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/19/oil-consumption-in-the-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Few Facts Supporting The Validity Of Peak Oil</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/10/a-few-facts-supporting-the-validity-of-peak-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/10/a-few-facts-supporting-the-validity-of-peak-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghawar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no question that peak oil is a contentious issue among those familiar with the discussions and considerations. Some adamantly deny that we are even close to producing the maximum rates of oil, while others ardently insist we are—or that we have already passed that point.
Let me start with just a few basics, to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/10/a-few-facts-supporting-the-validity-of-peak-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

