<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peak Oil Matters &#187; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peakoilmatters.com/tag/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peakoilmatters.com</link>
	<description>A fresh perspective on the concept of peak oil and the challenges we face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Still More Never-Ending Efforts To Skate Past The Facts Of Peak Oil (Pt 3)</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/10/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/10/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=1074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[NOTE: Back in April, I followed-up on a series of posts which I first began a year ago and last discussed back in April ([links below*). In that series, I’ve discussed the apparently limitless ability of too many to either ignore facts about oil production entirely, or who instead resort to efforts where disingenuous arguments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/10/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peak Oil: Impact # 5 &#8211; Laptops/Computers</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/07/01/peak-oil-impact-5-laptopscomputers/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/07/01/peak-oil-impact-5-laptopscomputers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil's Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-based products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing with my recent theme of getting readers to recognize more “I didn’t think of that” moments as they relate to Peak Oil (while avoiding any kind of structured or overly-detailed approach that might discourage readers from continuing on), today I’d like to discuss the ubiquitous laptop/personal computer.
These almost-mandatory-for-our-lifestyles products are in no small measure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/07/01/peak-oil-impact-5-laptopscomputers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peak Oil: Worth Noting</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/20/peak-oil-worth-noting/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/20/peak-oil-worth-noting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent some time on Friday catching up on my readings for the week, and came across several terrific articles that just happened to tie in quite nicely with the themes discussed in a series of posts I recently concluded.
I think it’s worthwhile to give those articles a little extra publicity. They will help provide readers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/20/peak-oil-worth-noting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peak Oil Info&#8217; Worth Noting</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/16/peak-oil-info-worth-noting-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/16/peak-oil-info-worth-noting-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this very nice piece at The Oil Drum today, written by David Murphy (here). His discussion about energy transitions is well worth considering (and happens to be a nice corollary to issues I raised in my last post, among others). It’s a terrific summary of significant changes in the history of mankind’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/16/peak-oil-info-worth-noting-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Arguments Against Peak Oil</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/12/some-arguments-against-peak-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/12/some-arguments-against-peak-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANWR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello again!
In my last post, I took a brief look at some of the facts suggesting that we are indeed at or very near the point when our planet’s maximum rate of oil production has been reached.
Today, I’ll point out some of the more popular arguments here in the U.S. disputing Peak Oil. As I’ll [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/12/some-arguments-against-peak-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

