<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peak Oil Matters &#187; rate of production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peakoilmatters.com/tag/rate-of-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peakoilmatters.com</link>
	<description>A fresh perspective on the concept of peak oil and the challenges we face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More Tiresome Denial</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2012/01/12/more-tiresome-denial/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2012/01/12/more-tiresome-denial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakken Formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=1271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would the New Year be if we didn’t have an offering of more half-truth, delusional nonsense about our fossil fuel status?
Amy Myers Jaffe (nice takedown here) wrote an article for Foreign Policy a while back, serving up another example from the playbook of denial nonsense. As I suggested in a series of posts at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2012/01/12/more-tiresome-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still More Never-Ending Efforts To Skate Past The Facts Of Peak Oil (Pt 2)</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/03/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-2/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/03/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=1040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[NOTE: Back in April, I followed-up on a series of posts which I first began nearly a year ago and last discussed back in April ([links below*). In that series, I’ve discussed the apparently limitless ability of too many to either ignore facts about oil production entirely, or who instead resort to efforts where disingenuous [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/10/03/still-more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil-pt-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Few Facts Supporting The Validity Of Peak Oil</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/10/a-few-facts-supporting-the-validity-of-peak-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/10/a-few-facts-supporting-the-validity-of-peak-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghawar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no question that peak oil is a contentious issue among those familiar with the discussions and considerations. Some adamantly deny that we are even close to producing the maximum rates of oil, while others ardently insist we are—or that we have already passed that point.
Let me start with just a few basics, to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2009/12/10/a-few-facts-supporting-the-validity-of-peak-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

