<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peak Oil Matters &#187; heavy oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peakoilmatters.com/tag/heavy-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peakoilmatters.com</link>
	<description>A fresh perspective on the concept of peak oil and the challenges we face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 09:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More Tiresome Denial</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2012/01/12/more-tiresome-denial/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2012/01/12/more-tiresome-denial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakken Formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=1271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would the New Year be if we didn’t have an offering of more half-truth, delusional nonsense about our fossil fuel status?
Amy Myers Jaffe (nice takedown here) wrote an article for Foreign Policy a while back, serving up another example from the playbook of denial nonsense. As I suggested in a series of posts at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2012/01/12/more-tiresome-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Never-Ending Efforts To Skate Past The Facts Of Peak Oil</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/02/10/more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/02/10/more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kashagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orinoco Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent post (here), I indicated that there were two more recent articles unseriously attempting to persuade readers that all is well in oil-production world. I’ll discuss the second piece today. (There are always more, of course, but these two jumped out at me as “better” examples of misguided attempts to deny that we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2011/02/10/more-never-ending-efforts-to-skate-past-the-facts-of-peak-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worth Noting</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/02/worth-noting-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/02/worth-noting-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, I came across an interesting online article from The Wall Street Journal.
The paper is reporting that Venezuela’s energy and oil minister is meeting in China with government and oil industry official there. The main topics of discussion will be a joint-venture refinery project and more Chinese government investment in the Venezuelan oil reserves. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/02/worth-noting-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Look At Venezuela</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/01/a-look-at-venezuela/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/01/a-look-at-venezuela/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orinoco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once more I’d like to detour away from my next planned post and discuss a news item that received a fair amount of media attention last week: the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) assessment that Venezuela’s Orinoco Oil Belt now contains a bit more than 500 billion barrels of “technically recoverable” oil.
There’s certainly no question [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/01/a-look-at-venezuela/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

