<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peak Oil Matters &#187; geopolitical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peakoilmatters.com/tag/geopolitical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peakoilmatters.com</link>
	<description>A fresh perspective on the concept of peak oil and the challenges we face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Thinking Out Loud, Again</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/12/09/thinking-out-loud-again/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/12/09/thinking-out-loud-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few more thoughts on the heels of Monday’s post.
In a recent article on energy, climate change, and sports, Amanda Little shared an anecdote about an iconic National Football League team.
“The new Dallas Cowboy’s stadium, for instance, is an energy-guzzling Colossus averaging $200,000 in monthly utility bills 	and consuming about as much power as Santa [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/12/09/thinking-out-loud-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Geopolitical Peak Oil Considerations</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/09/20/some-geopolitical-peak-oil-considerations/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/09/20/some-geopolitical-peak-oil-considerations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export Land Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven’t touched on too many geopolitical issues (but see here and here for examples) as they bear upon Peak Oil, but that is a result of choices made, and not a determination that the subject is unimportant.
The recent publication of both German and Australian reports on Peak Oil (here and here—the subject of an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/09/20/some-geopolitical-peak-oil-considerations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peak Oil: Worth Noting</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/20/peak-oil-worth-noting/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/20/peak-oil-worth-noting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent some time on Friday catching up on my readings for the week, and came across several terrific articles that just happened to tie in quite nicely with the themes discussed in a series of posts I recently concluded.
I think it’s worthwhile to give those articles a little extra publicity. They will help provide readers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/20/peak-oil-worth-noting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking Ahead To Peak Oil Transition: Part III</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/13/looking-ahead-to-peak-oil-transition-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/13/looking-ahead-to-peak-oil-transition-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It remains my hope that with the right level of effort, commitment, vision, understanding, and action (BIG “ifs” of course), we can effect a reasonably non-disruptive transition away from our excessive fossil fuel dependency. It won’t be perfect or struggle-free, but we can take steps to make it easier. At this point, “easier” may be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/13/looking-ahead-to-peak-oil-transition-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worth Noting</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/02/worth-noting-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/02/worth-noting-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, I came across an interesting online article from The Wall Street Journal.
The paper is reporting that Venezuela’s energy and oil minister is meeting in China with government and oil industry official there. The main topics of discussion will be a joint-venture refinery project and more Chinese government investment in the Venezuelan oil reserves. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/02/worth-noting-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Look At Venezuela</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/01/a-look-at-venezuela/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/01/a-look-at-venezuela/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orinoco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once more I’d like to detour away from my next planned post and discuss a news item that received a fair amount of media attention last week: the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) assessment that Venezuela’s Orinoco Oil Belt now contains a bit more than 500 billion barrels of “technically recoverable” oil.
There’s certainly no question [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/02/01/a-look-at-venezuela/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Other Considerations &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/01/13/other-considerations-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/01/13/other-considerations-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, the always-wonderful New York Times columnist Bob Herbert raised some interesting questions about America’s future:
What will the United States be like in 20 years when today’s toddlers are in college or trying to land that first job or maybe  thinking about starting a family?
The answer will depend to a great extent on decisions we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/01/13/other-considerations-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

