<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peak Oil Matters &#187; enhanced oil recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peakoilmatters.com/tag/enhanced-oil-recovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peakoilmatters.com</link>
	<description>A fresh perspective on the concept of peak oil and the challenges we face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Stubbornness Of Denial</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/12/20/the-stubbornness-of-denial/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/12/20/the-stubbornness-of-denial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced oil recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sigh&#8230;.
This is my last planned post of 2010, and it was not my intention to discuss more curious examples of the phenomenon of ignoring facts. Like those who deny global warming amid an avalanche of evidence, the stubborn resistance to peak oil remains just as &#8230; well, stubborn. (When our military is worried, we should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/12/20/the-stubbornness-of-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Comment About Disputing Peak Oil</title>
		<link>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/01/26/a-comment-about-disputing-peak-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/01/26/a-comment-about-disputing-peak-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Turcotte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil Denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced oil recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakoilmatters.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before moving to my next scheduled post (“Shifting Gears”) I thought it worthwhile to offer some commentary on a January 25th news/financial item I came across today (See http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2010/Exxon-Mobil-Rejuvenates-Mature-Oil-Field-XOM0125.aspx  &#8211; Exxon Mobil Rejuvenates Mature Oil Field by Eric Fox) regarding Exxon Mobil’s decision to invest some $700 million for an enhanced oil recovery project at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://peakoilmatters.com/2010/01/26/a-comment-about-disputing-peak-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

